All Posts in

- No Comments!

Ten Years of Grøss… Wow, Forreal?

First things first:

  1. 10YR RSVP
  2. NEW MERCH
  3. APROPOS SCULPTURE

In 2016, we started making a magazine in San Francisco without particularly knowing what a magazine was supposed to become. There was no grand "ten-year plan." Mostly, there were artists we liked, things we wanted to make, places we wanted to go, and a recurring willingness to make goofy shit happen because why not?

Apparently that can add up to a decade, hah!

So we’re bringing Grøss back to San Francisco for ten days to celebrate the whole strange thing: 67+ print features, hundreds of artists, stacks of paper, parties, exhibitions, stickers, questionable decisions, and a few objects that have somehow survived it.

Some of those objects aged better than others.

We recently dug up an old piece of Grøss merch from roughly the beginning of the magazine. Ten years of washing, wearing, folding, losing, and finding had slowly destroyed the logo. The print had cracked. Edges softened. Letters broke apart.

Technically, it was deteriorating.

It also looked fucking great. Like a real testament to time well spent.

Rather than restore it or only focus on the new and shiny, we used the damage as the reference for a new collection.

The new Grøss merch takes that accidental ten-year-old graphic and pushes it forward: a logo designed not from a pristine vector file buried on an old hard drive, but from the physical evidence of somebody actually living in the thing.

An archive created by wear.

Which, strangely, brings us to the magazines.

Apropos

In 1990, the year I was born, Maurizio Cattelan made 'Strategies,' a precarious house of cards constructed from Flash Art magazines, aluminum and glue. To me, that work represents the art world's fickle ecosystem: artists, galleries, critics, publications and markets leaning against one another, somehow keeping the whole thing upright.

I first encountered 'Strategies' at MAMbo in Bologna in 2021. It stuck with me, and I knew I wanted to reinterpret it using copies of Grøss eventually. It just needed a reason.

Ten years of Grøss feels like reason enough.

Cattelan transformed a publication into an artwork. For a decade, Grøss has done something like the inverse: transforming artworks, artists and the strange ecosystem surrounding them into a publication. Now the publication becomes artwork again. A neat feedback loop of appropriation.

One very important structural difference, though:

Cattelan's aluminum supports attempt to disappear, creating the illusion that his magazines are performing an improbable balancing act. Here, there is nothing to hide. Each Grøss is individually preserved inside a crystal-clear acrylic case—part frame, part exoskeleton, part preservation cryochamber. The support structure is clean, rigid, and proud to be seen.

The magazines don't bend. They're not cut, glued, or sacrificed at the altar of art. They're protected as the artifacts they've become after ten years of making the damn things.

An appropriator appropriating an appropriator and calling it 'Apropos.' 🙂

Whether this is homage, theft, institutional critique, publishing therapy, or an unnecessarily elaborate way of displaying magazines is up to you.

Maurizio, if this somehow finds its way to you: I owe you one.

Literally. I'll send you an edition. All I need is an address.

The Archive Is Open

For the anniversary pop-up, we’re also doing something we rarely get to do properly: putting the entire decade in the same room.

Visitors will be able to look back through 67+ Grøss print features spanning the magazine’s history.

Not a greatest-hits edit. The actual trail.

Different artists. Different eras. Different design decisions. Different versions of us figuring out what the publication could be.

We’ll also be making framed prints of featured title spreads available, so you can take a piece of the archive home.

There will be original artwork throughout the space, limited-edition sculptures, the new merch collection, live music, DJ sets, and whatever else inevitably happens once enough people are standing in the same room.

Come get wild with us.

Ten Years. Ten Days.

There is one slightly stupid part about spending ten years making something and then building an anniversary exhibition around it:

We’re only keeping it open for ten days.

Then it’s gone, gone, gone.

Which is probably appropriate.

Grøss has never been particularly interested in pretending things last forever. Shirts deteriorate. Exhibitions close. Stickers end up on bathroom walls only to be scraped into the trash. People move. Cities fluctuate. Artists become famous or disappear or make something completely different.

Sometimes preservation matters.

Sometimes deterioration makes the thing better.

Mostly, it's important to make the damn thing while you can.

So, San Francisco:

Come celebrate ten years of Grøss with us. Look through the archive. See Apropos in person. Buy a shirt based on a shirt that barely survived. Take home some art. Hear some music. Stay too late.

RSVP or purchase any merch, and you’ll also receive a limited-edition Grøss sticker.

Ten years down.

Still making goofy shit happen.

Because why not?

Victor Gonzalez
Co-founder, Grøss Magazine

- No Comments!

Heritage, Curated by Ethereal Reflections in Portland, OR

Maynard Villaflores/BFA.com + Nicholas Wilson

On May 15th, Design Portland hosted Heritage, the eighth exhibition curated by Lena Vasilenko and Emma Strgar of Ethereal Reflections. For just one fleeting night, 33 artists working across painting, sculpture, ceramics, and photography came together to unpack the strange, layered weight of inheritance — not just culturally, but emotionally, socially, and personally too. Heady stuff for dreamy people.

Maynard Villaflores/BFA.com + Nicholas Wilson

The show circled around questions that don’t really have straight answers: What do we inherit versus invent for ourselves? How much of identity is chosen, and how much is assigned? What gets lost when labels are assigned? Is that good or bad?

What's cool, though, Heritage didn’t approach these ideas in some strict academic way. The exhibition felt human and messy in the right places. It felt personal without becoming overly precious.

What made the show memorable was its balance. Thirty-three artists is enough to easily lose sight of a common thread, but the curation didn't meander. The exhibition presented more like an ongoing conversation — different voices bouncing off each other without needing total agreement. Some of those voices were soft and subtle while others we're boiseterous. All were heard.

There was also a clever edible installation woven into the evening, which somehow made perfect sense. Taste and memory are known to be closely related anyway. Certain flavors can pull you backward through time faster than photographs can. It added yet another layer to the experience without screaming for attention.

Maynard Villaflores/BFA.com + Nicholas Wilson

More than anything, Heritage felt refreshingly sincere and welcoming. At a moment when a lot of contemporary art seems trapped between branding exercises and social performance, this show chose reflection instead. Quietly. Confidently.

Somewhere between the sculptures, photographs, and conversations drifting through the room, the exhibition landed on a truth most people already know deep down: we’re all carrying things that were handed to us. The real question is what we decide to keep and why???

Photo: Maynard Villaflores/BFA.com + Nicholas Wilson

- No Comments!

Please Wipe Your Shoes Before Walking on Michelle Alexander

Michelle Alexander on Reclaiming the Body Through Art 

Michelle Alexander, Split Self, 2021, digital image on paper

Chicago-based artist Michelle Alexander is not afraid to make you uncomfortable—especially if you’re standing on her nipple. In this conversation, Alexander and I discuss everything from her recent exhibition My Body/Your Object, which featured carpet-sized images of her skin that viewers could walk on, to how her fashion background helped shape her craft now. Whether talking about curating shows or the highly personal works of Félix González-Torres, Alexander’s interest in the body—as something consumable, shared between people, soft yet unruly—leaks into every word. There's no shortage of artists' work about the body, but, given that our animal selves are the source of all experience, the body—as Alexander proves—will never be dull material.

— Mieke Marple

Mieke Marple: In your most recent exhibition My Body/Your Object at Mathew Heberlein Contemporary, you printed out oversized close-ups of your body that visitors could walk on. These close-ups feature skin folds, cropped nipples, and freckles. What was your intention here?

Michelle Alexander: I was trying to create a physical confrontation between the viewer and my body, but not in a voyeuristic way. These images are intimate but not flattering. They’re cropped, zoomed in, and raw. I wanted to remove the typical cues we use to categorize bodies, especially female bodies, and instead show skin as terrain, as surface. Letting people walk on these images raised questions for me about ownership, consumption, power, and awareness. It was less about making a statement and more about offering a moment of discomfort or pause.

Michelle Alexander, Grounding Touch, 2021, digital image on paper and lino print on mylar

MM: Did the way visitors interact with the works surprise you? Were there any differences between what you expected and what actually happened?

MA: Definitely. Some people walked right across the carpets without a second thought. Others hesitated and walked around, or asked if it was okay. That hesitation said a lot to me. Watching people decide how to move through the space revealed something I didn’t fully anticipate: my own dynamic with people-pleasing. It made me wonder if putting myself literally on the floor to be walked on was a way of reclaiming that tendency, of setting new terms for how my body is engaged with. The work became a kind of boundary-setting exercise, even as it appeared boundary-less.

I was also hyper-aware of if and when people even realized they were interacting with the works; drinking it, eating it, holding it, stepping on it. That blur between art and environment was intentional, but it also left me wondering: When does the work become more about them than me? Or is that transfer even possible? I don’t think I have a clear answer yet, but that tension between control and release, between author and audience, has stayed with me.

Michelle Alexander, "My Body/Your Object," 2025, installation view at Mathew Heberlein Contemporary, Chicago IL. Photo credit: Jonas Muller-Ahlheim

MM: I see echoes of Eleanor Antin’s “carving piece” and Marina Abramović's “Rhythm 0” in this piece. What is the artistic legacy that you see yourself a part of?

MA: Wow, that is so flattering to be talked about in conversation with those incredible artists and those works that feel both surreal and deeply meaningful. I definitely look to artists who use their bodies as material, especially women who use their bodies as a canvas in ways that are surprising, uncomfortable, and complicated. That legacy matters to me not in terms of notoriety or performance, but in how those artists create space for bodies that don’t behave or perform in socially acceptable ways. My work is part of that lineage, but it’s also grounded in installation and material manipulation. I’m interested in what the body leaves behind: impressions, fragments, traces. It’s less about performing the body in real time and more about making its presence felt after the fact, what lingers, what’s carried, what’s been touched, changed, or awakened inside you.

MM: You worked as an associate designer at Amur, assistant designer at ML Monique Lhuillier, and an assistant designer at Longstreet, developing garment designs for brands like US Polo Association, Limited Too, Kensie Girl, New Balance Girls, and Nine Threads. How does your background in fashion inform your art practice? Were you always making art or is artmaking something you came to later?

MA: Art and creative expression have always been central to my life. Before studying fashion, I studied painting and photography in undergrad. Making art has always been my best outlet for trying to understand myself and the world around me.

Fashion came later and became my first real education in how bodies are controlled. I learned how silhouettes can be shaped, how garments can seduce or restrict. That had a huge impact on how I think about form. In my artwork now, I still use fabric, structure, and decoration, but I twist them. I make them heavy, raw, awkward, and vulnerable. My relationship to fashion and my body is complicated, and that complexity drives a lot of my practice.

The pressure to be thin, beautiful, put together, or perfect trickles into every part of the fashion machine. That pressure is palpable, and it stays with you. It gets under your skin, into your daily habits, and shapes your sense of self-worth.

While I was always creative, I didn’t come into art seriously until later. It became a way to process everything left behind in me. Through my work, I’m often trying to reclaim the body, to disrupt those systems of control, and to ask new questions about how we define beauty, power, and presence.

portrait of Michelle Alexander

MM: You also recently curated a show “Connective Thread” at Ivory Gate Gallery that included work by Michelle Grabner, Adrianne Rubenstein, and yourself, among others. What made you want to curate this show, and how do you see curating as an extension of your practice?

MA: That show came out of admiration and creating opportunity, honestly. I was a fan of these artists first. I reached out to people I deeply respect, and I was lucky they trusted me enough to say yes. The show was rooted in my own questions about womanhood, softness, and strength. I was looking for work that engaged with the body not just as subject, but as material, as something to be shaped, tested, and transformed.

Curating gave me the chance to create a space where different forms of embodiment could be in conversation. It felt like assembling a shared nervous system. The decisions I made were intuitive and personal, completely tied to my own practice. It didn’t feel like a separate role; it felt like an extension of the same questions I ask in my studio.

So much of the time, how and where artists show their work is taken out of our hands. Curating felt like a way to reclaim some of that. To mold the vision, shape the atmosphere, and build a context with intention and make it happen. It gave me the opportunity to expose myself and others to artists I admire and to bring that admiration into a public, collective space.

MM: What are you working on now? And where do you see your work going in the next five years?

MA: I’m working on some new sculptural installation pieces that explore how the body responds to external pressure, especially within male-dominated spaces. I’m experimenting with fragmented forms and possibly integrating sound elements to deepen the physical and emotional impact. I’m still really interested in how environments can hold the weight of a body or push against it and how materials can carry emotional residue.

A lot of my focus continues to be on the complications of being in a body, trying to understand it, and building spaces where viewers can see themselves and feel seen. I want the work to create moments of confrontation but also recognition, especially around the layered and often contradictory experience of being in a female body.

Looking ahead, I hope to push further into immersive installation and maybe start working in more public or site-responsive contexts. I want to continue using materiality to shift emotional landscapes, not just visual ones.

In five years, I hope I’m still making work that is honest, uncomfortable, and generous in its tension, work that opens space for softness, contradiction, and deeper understanding of embodiment, especially within the ongoing messiness of just being.

Michelle Alexander, Flayed, 2022, digital images on organza, charcoal, pins, dressforms

MM: If you could ask a question to any artist, living or dead, who would you choose and what would your question be?

MA: I’d like to talk to Félix González-Torres. I’d ask him how it feels to see people interact with “Untitled” (Portrait of Ross in L.A.), to watch them take candy, eat it, and walk away. How does it feel to see something so heavy handled through sweetness? What does it mean to make grief consumable, to represent a body as a pile of shimmering candy? I’d want to know what candy meant to him in that context, what the sugar, the metallic foil, the act of giving away and disappearing stood for emotionally, politically, personally.

I’d also ask about the role of the viewer, how it feels to have them physically participate in the piece, to complete it, even when they might not fully understand what it’s about. When the work is so deeply personal, how does it feel to have that meaning fragmented by the public? Does it matter if they don’t know the story? Or is that distance part of it, too? I think his ability to hold intimacy and anonymity in the same gesture is incredibly powerful, and I wonder how he carried that tension as an artist and as a person.

To learn more about Michelle, follow her Instagram and visit her website.

Michelle Alexander, Weight of the Ideal, 2024, mixed media

Michelle Alexander, The Pressure, 2025, installation view at Ivory Gate Gallery, Chicago IL.

Michelle Alexander, Pieced Back Together, 2021, mixed media

For more from Mieke:
Miekemarple.com
Instagram
Substack